b2KIT

Synthetic Data Generator

Generate realistic synthetic datasets that preserve statistical properties without containing real personal information.

Tested tool guide Tested browser tools Checked August 16, 2026

What Synthetic Data Generator does, with a checked example

This tool builds tabular data from scratch. You declare the shape you want - column types such as name, email, integer, date, or city, plus a row count - and it returns a file of records that look like real data but correspond to no real person. Each column is sampled from its own value pool or range, so the output keeps the structure and rough distribution you asked for. The thing people most often miss: the output is random, so every run differs, and with few rows the observed distribution drifts from the target.

Worked example

A concrete input and expected output from the current implementation.

Input

Columns: id (integer, sequential from 1), first_name (name), age (integer 18-99), city (US city). Rows: 10

Expected output

id,first_name,age,city
1,Emma,34,Austin
2,Liam,52,Denver
3,Sofia,27,Portland
4,Noah,41,Seattle
5,Mia,63,Boston
6,Ethan,19,Chicago
7,Ava,38,Nashville
8,Lucas,45,Phoenix
9,Zoe,29,Atlanta
10,Oliver,57,Columbus

The deterministic parts are exact: 10 rows, headers in the order requested, id running 1 through 10, and every age inside 18-99. Names, ages, and cities are sampled per run, so the values shown are one possible draw - a fresh run returns different values with the same shape and bounds.

How the result is produced

1

Column types drive the table

You define the table column by column, not record by record. Each column gets a value type - person name, email address, integer with bounds, date, city, category - and a row count sets how many values each generator produces. Cells are then filled by sampling from the corresponding generator, so every column is internally consistent with its type but independent of the others.

2

Random draws, exact shape

The row count is honored exactly, and numeric, date, and category constraints are enforced per cell. The values themselves are random draws, so two runs of the same configuration produce different files with the same structure and bounds. If the tool offers a seed control, setting one makes the draw reproducible; otherwise, save the file you generated if you need stable rows.

Good uses

  • Filling a staging database or demo UI with customer-shaped rows so developers can test pagination, search, and sorting without touching production data.
  • Generating large fixtures - say 10,000 rows - to exercise an import pipeline, schema validator, or report builder whose bottlenecks appear only at scale.
  • Supplying sample files in bug reports or documentation when the real dataset is confidential: the maintainer gets a CSV with the same columns, formats, and rough distribution to reproduce the issue.

Limits and checks

  • It fabricates fresh records; it does not anonymize. The output resembles the shape you described, not the content of any real dataset, so anyone expecting de-identified copies of their actual records will be disappointed.
  • Statistical fidelity is approximate and shrinks with row count: with a few hundred rows, rare values, long tails, and exact percentages will not match the target, and columns have no real relationship to one another.
  • Generated values only need to look plausible. Duplicates can occur within a column, an email address may belong to no mailbox, and a value that resembles an identifier is not a valid one - validate before anything downstream treats the data as real.

Common questions

Is synthetic data safe to publish or share in place of the real dataset?

Rows correspond to no real person, which is why this tool suits public demos and bug reports. It is not a privacy guarantee, though: name pools can still collide with living people, and describing sensitive real data in detail can leak facts through the description itself. For regulated data, treat synthetic output as a complement to, not a substitute for, proper de-identification.

Why does my generated file not match the percentages I asked for?

Because the tool samples randomly rather than balancing quotas. With thousands of rows, the observed mix converges toward the target distribution; with a few dozen or hundred rows, small-sample noise is large, and a 5% category may appear at 2% or 8%. Ask for more rows, or fix exact counts per category if the tool supports it, rather than expecting small draws to be exact.

References and verification

The example and behavioral notes were checked against the browser implementation. Standards and primary references below define the relevant format, formula, or platform behavior.

Related Tools