b2KIT

CI Pipeline Config Generator

Generate CI/CD configs for GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins, and Travis CI with template stages.

Tested tool guide Tested browser tools Checked August 16, 2026

What CI Pipeline Config Generator does, with a checked example

Generate a build pipeline config for GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins, or Travis CI from a few selections. You pick the target, choose stages such as build, test, and deploy, and type the command each stage runs; the tool assembles a single file in that system's own syntax. The usual surprise is that the four systems share the same stage vocabulary but not the same format: output for one is meaningless to the others, and switching providers means generating again, not reusing the file. Everything runs in the browser; the commands you paste never leave your machine. The result is a syntactically valid scaffold ready for real commands.

Worked example

A concrete input and expected output from the current implementation.

Input

Target: GitLab CI
Stages: build, test
Build script: pip install -r requirements.txt
Test script: pytest

Expected output

stages:
  - build
  - test

build:
  stage: build
  script:
    - pip install -r requirements.txt

test:
  stage: test
  script:
    - pytest

A GitLab CI config is YAML: a top-level stages list fixes the run order, and every job declares a stage plus a script list. The generator maps each chosen stage to one job with that stage name and places the command you typed for it under the job's script key.

How the result is produced

1

One job per selected stage

The tool holds a skeleton for each target and inserts your choices into it. For GitLab CI the skeleton is a stages list plus one job block per stage; each job carries a stage key naming its phase and a script list holding the commands you typed. Jobs appear in the order you selected their stages.

2

Syntax varies by target

The four outputs do not share a format. GitLab CI and Travis CI are YAML but with different shapes: GitLab nests commands in per-job script lists, while Travis CI's legacy lifecycle puts them in top-level install and script keys and its jobs/include matrix form keeps them in per-job script keys under a named stage. CircleCI 2.1 is YAML with jobs, steps, and a workflows section. Jenkins is a Groovy Jenkinsfile wrapping stages in a declarative pipeline block. The same stage choices render four structurally different files.

Good uses

  • You are adding CI to a repository that has none and want a syntactically valid config to start from instead of copying a blog example.
  • A project is migrating from one provider to another and you need a fresh config for the new system rather than a line-by-line conversion of the old one.
  • You are learning a CI system you have never configured and want its canonical build-test-deploy skeleton as a base for your own file.

Limits and checks

  • Template script lines are placeholders. Until you replace the generic commands, a pipeline can pass while doing nothing, which is easy to miss in review.
  • Stage order is enforced differently everywhere: GitLab runs the stages list top to bottom, Jenkins executes stages in written order, and CircleCI ordering lives in the workflows section. Configs that look alike can execute in different orders.
  • The file is not validated against the real system, and nothing checks that it parses under the target's own rules. Failures surface only when the pipeline runs, for example an unrecognized Travis language key, missing secrets, or no runner available.

Common questions

Can it convert an existing GitLab config into a Jenkinsfile?

No. It generates from templates; it does not parse files you already have, so you re-enter the stage names and commands yourself. Even the stage skeleton transfers imperfectly: provider-specific features such as caches, artifacts, matrix builds, and environment-scoped secrets have no direct equivalent in the other systems and must be recreated by hand.

Does it know how to build my specific language or framework?

Only at the level of syntax. The generator knows CI file formats, not your project's build steps, so the commands come from you, and no target's output carries a language or interpreter marker: the same selections produce the same file whatever language you build. There is no framework detection and no dependency resolution; plan to edit the output.

References and verification

The example and behavioral notes were checked against the browser implementation. Standards and primary references below define the relevant format, formula, or platform behavior.

Related Tools