b2KIT

Retirement Savings Gap Analyzer

Identify the gap between current savings trajectory and retirement goals with catch-up contribution recommendations.

Tested tool guide Tested browser tools Checked August 16, 2026

What Retirement Savings Gap Analyzer does, with a checked example

Every retirement shortfall has a price tag: the extra monthly contribution that would close it by the time you retire. This tool computes that price. You provide age, planned retirement age, current balance, monthly contributions, expected return, and a target balance; the tool projects the balance you will actually reach, reports the gap, and states the catch-up contribution needed each month to hit the target on schedule. The input most people get wrong is the expected return: one percentage point either way shifts the outcome by hundreds of dollars a month, so the projection is only as good as that assumption.

Worked example

A concrete input and expected output from the current implementation.

Input

Age 40, retiring at 65. Current balance: $100,000. Saves $500 per month. Expected return: 6% per year, compounded monthly. Target: $1,000,000 at 65.

Expected output

Projected balance at 65: about $775,700. Gap vs target: about $224,300. Required contribution: about $824 per month (currently $500), a catch-up of about $324 per month.

At 6% compounded monthly for 25 years, the $100,000 grows to about $429,000 and the $500 monthly contributions to about $346,000, totaling about $776,000. Closing the remaining $224,000 gap requires about $824 per month instead of $500. Every figure follows from standard future-value arithmetic on the stated 6% assumption; a different assumed return changes them all.

How the result is produced

1

Projection

The projection is ordinary compound-interest math. Your current balance is grown from today to your retirement age at the assumed annual return, and your periodic contributions are grown as a separate series of deposits; the two are added. Because returns compound for decades, small input changes become large differences, and the assumed return matters more than any other input in the model.

2

Gap and catch-up

The projected balance is subtracted from your target to get the shortfall in retirement-year dollars. The tool then reverses the growth formula: it finds the contribution level whose own projected growth equals that shortfall by retirement. That level, usually shown as a monthly amount and as the increase over your current contribution, is the catch-up recommendation.

Good uses

  • You have not raised your 401(k) deferral in years and want to know whether the current contribution rate still reaches the balance you assumed, and what a modest increase would do.
  • You received a lump sum from a job change, inheritance, or bonus and want to test whether investing it now reduces the gap enough to avoid raising monthly contributions.
  • You are within five to ten years of retirement, the projection shows a shortfall, and you want a concrete monthly catch-up target and a sense of how much later decisions would cost.

Limits and checks

  • The assumed return dominates the result. The example above ends near $776,000 at 6% but near $636,000 at 5%, roughly $140,000 less. Run several rates before trusting a single projection; the gap is a function of your assumption, not a fact.
  • The output is in future dollars at the assumed return. If your target expresses today's purchasing power, you need an inflation-adjusted (real) return assumption; without one, the projected balance looks higher than it is in today's terms and the gap looks smaller.
  • A balance is not an income plan. The projection says nothing about sustainable withdrawals, taxes, Social Security, or pensions, which are income streams no balance model can count. For savers with substantial Social Security or pension income, the gap is conservative: too large.

Common questions

What if the recommended catch-up is more than I can legally contribute?

It can happen, especially when starting late or near retirement. IRS limits on 401(k) and IRA contributions, including the higher catch-up allowances for savers 50 and over, are set each year and can sit below what the raw math suggests. The tool's number is a savings target, not a compliance check; if it exceeds the legal limit, the realistic options are taxable brokerage savings, a later retirement date, or a lower goal.

Does it count my employer match or Social Security?

Only what you enter. If there are fields for a match, use them; otherwise include the match as part of your monthly contribution. Social Security and pensions are income streams, not balances, and balance-target models generally ignore them. For people with substantial Social Security or pension income, that makes the gap conservative, showing a larger shortfall than reality.

References and verification

The example and behavioral notes were checked against the browser implementation. Standards and primary references below define the relevant format, formula, or platform behavior.

Related Tools